Gallery of Unfinished (and Usually Rageful) Thoughts

Fuck it. I am too tired of self-censoring in the worry of appearing vane, monotonous, reactionary, or whatever the hell i thought of when I read that pompous, unusually delusional, and hopelessly unoriginal and inarticulate ass of a “writer” La Rochefoucauld and some other half-witty half-cynical bullshit that was so much of western classics. They were cynical I get it. But be cynical in style my dear dude.

What the hell. I self-repressed for years just because I didn’t want to be put in the same category as La Roach in my own fucking head. How bad do you have to be for me to be soo wary of any seemliness to you? God you ruined cynicism for all of us. And now what ever I said you are tainted in it forever.

Go fuck yourself. Ahhh maybe you were so limp that you couldn’t even do that you shithead.

Okay it wasn’t just him, okay? This whole business of writing and dissimulating is so mind-boggling to me. If you were doing it for the sake of transcendence, then just DO it already, which spend years writing about it? It’s not like you were making it anymore accessible; the absolute fucking opposite if anything. If not, then it was just some salon credit that you were accumulating. Especially for some rich good-for-nothing like La Roach, ugh. Spinoza probably had a fucking CALLING for writing. You and your lot? Unselfconscious high class propogandists and parasites of collective human world-making and self-knowledge. Ugh.

But what’s so hard to admit is that I have the exact same fucking urges. To sound witty, to sound sharp, to sound like this world is worth nothing, so rotten that total annihilation would be better than any possible incremental betterment. DOLPHINES can probably do better than us. Okay, these shitheads probably cannot. Anyroad.

This urge to be a critique is really so vain, not even in the subjective sense of vanity but that it is just vain to be a critique without being able to articulate the sublation of the criticized. For all that thinking can be, especially the branch of thinking that tries to claim the moniker and the domain of something remotely universal, critique that does not result in any worldly changes is so empty. Cultural critics get a point over the philosophical ones on this issue because at least some playwright will enter into a dialectic with the critic, however nonsensible they sound, and the product will be affected SOMEHOW, regardless of for good or for bad.

When philosophers criticize each other? Is this the original form of circlejerk? Has anybody ever attempted to count the number of research magazines available in the humanities and “social ‘sciences’”? And I thought Summa was a enormous mistake… In the rare occasion that philosophers actually exit their craft of circular self-pleasantry and say something facing the world. Their voices are drowning out so quickly and so powerlessly that unless one makes a spectacle–meaning this time jerking the speaker holders and the perpetual-novelty-seeking-milk-sucking consumer babies–their attempt to talking is just like any other voices in the market of ideas. A weak and invisible thread in the infinitely whirling and self-weaving fabric of pleonexia and assimilating domination.

What use is thinking and words when their substantiation is no different from the lack there of? The aftertaste of nullity only makes everything bitterer.

But ha, the catch is that if you are like me, who seems to just have such an overabundance of self-consciousness, the bitterness does not just dissipate because I try to remain silent. The urge comes, the counter-urges quiets, the reminder that all of this is pointless also comes, and the self-pitying attempt at gathering hope rots faster and faster every time this cycle cycles. AND IT CYCLES SO QUICKLY.

So distractions distractions and distractions. Disassociations displacements deflations. Alas no amount of “De”s detract the disquietments. So maybe I try another approach to hold on to the laughable hope. I try, despite my disgust of La Roach, to say the cynical vain unoriginal ineffective-against-this-totality bitching shit that’s been enlivening and fermenting in my guts for years.

Don’t expect yogurt and wine though. Best I can do moldy bread.

Enjoy at your own peril.



10 responses to “Gallery of Unfinished (and Usually Rageful) Thoughts”

  1. So exactly what is this? It’s gonna be a comment train dump of my personal shitposts when i think of something. Like trans twitter but just me and like the 3 of you who would read this dumpster fire.


  2. Concerted stares from your cats Avatar
    Concerted stares from your cats

    :3 leaving a tiny piece of gentleness in your anger dumpster so maybe every time you come here to roast or rant you remember to drink some water


    1. only soda no water *angry face*


  3. “But surely,” someone will object, “it is not easy for evil to remain always hidden.” We will reply that nothing great is easy. And, in any case, if we are to be happy, we must go where the tracks of the arguments lead. To remain undiscovered we will form secret societies and political clubs. And there are teachers of persuasion to make us clever in dealing with assemblies and law courts. Therefore, partly by persuasion, partly by force, we will contrive to do better than other people, without paying the penalty.

    365d

    Ah, what a wonderous history we’ve traversed to have achieved exactly… NOTHING.


  4. I’ve said this to friends and lovers a like for a long time now, and abstractly this has been said in social and political philosophy for decades – but individual mental health care can only go so far.

    If there is any legitimate impetus to have any mental health care at all, it is probably about seeing reality as they are (recognizing trauma as they are, and recognizing non-traumatic parts of the world as they are), instead of seeing all of reality through the lens of trauma. Hence some philosophers think of their philosophy as therapeutic, like Wittgenstein.

    This being the case, if reality is simply traumatizing in structural ways that unorganized individualized atomized persons cannot cope with, individualized mental health care is either futile or counterproductive if it thinks of itself in a conservative form. You can not reform structural trauma out of individuals. We break.

    If the goal of caring in mental health is carried to its extreme, then therapists and social workers should all be revolutionaries, not just mental health advocates or what have you in respectable progressive corpo talk, since creating sustainable non-traumatizing environment would be an integral part of therapists’ work as responsibilities to those in their care.

    This also goes for health care in general, for a world littered with microplastic cannot be conducive to health.

    Also goes for teachers and their care of their students, and so on

    Oh, and the least of all, politicians and their constituents :)))))

    Now you see, this kind of argumentation from status quo to a supposed radical conclusion doesn’t really work by itself. It only kind of works if one assumes some kind of good intention on the part of the practitioner. That is – if I am a good therapist, sincere in wanting to help those in my care and wanting to make good on my practice and my art, and seeing the above, the argument has the potential to enlighten me on my very practice that I was not aware of before. Which might lead to my changing my practice. Which is the goal of writing like this.

    But if that is not the reason why I practice what I practice, then all of this is useless. What critical analysis can do is to clarify and persuade the good-intentioned at best. It does not enlighten anyone who is careless about the immanent ends of whatever art, tradition, or systematic tendencies of activities that they are a part of. We see this in the case of politicians easily, but perhaps less so in therapists. But most people are caught up in all sorts of reasons to hold on to their job as a wage-means to subsistence and survival. Even if aspiration to the immanent ends are there, pursuit might be unrealistic.

    So what is to be done?

    But yeah, i just want to complaint about why my mood is out of my fucking control and my psychiatrist and therapist can only do so much if THE LITERAL WORLD does not change real quick.


  5. Me: awww look at all these cute animals

    Also me: yeah but they will all suffer a respective genocide, fast or slow all alike painful and miserable, because of you lot 🙂

    Have I even lost Instagram cute animals as a coping mechanism (⁠ʘ⁠ᴗ⁠ʘ⁠✿⁠)


  6. 装疯卖傻真的有助于心理健康


  7. The only condition of possibility of ethical philosophy in any time, particularly in time of simultaneous crises, is to be politically conducive to the caseation and the eventual abolition of the forms of crises in the present moment.

    Any theoretical dabbling less than this is the aestheticization of thought. It is the most intolerable mockery of those in crises, because the fact of contemplating something else announces the relative unimportance of the lives of those suffering. It is cruelty, full stop.

    That’s my bar and that’s why i freeze.


  8. A friend prompted a “degoogling” motion in me, s, and some mutual friends.

    my attitude used to be something like – it’s fine sell my information i guess

    but now my that sold information being more vividly connected to mass preventable deaths – i do find it more motivating to not allow my info to be sold, but that i am somehow egoistic or paranoid for wanting to prevent it (something i used to think of relating to this… why?)

    the open-source projects that tries to make alternatives to all the digital functionalities of the big three and more – they are like digital communes that is part and parcel of a livable futurity.

    non-participation in user-as-consumer-and-product digital space is not some kind of naive separatism. non-participation of an exclusive power relation (say voter to government) is a helpless cry. The form of protest there has to be more volatile.

    but digital space is not construed with exclusivity (yet) like the monopoly of violence and legality of a state. open-source, self-hosted, peer-to-peer, end-to-end type of digital relations is what is akin to new land, something that no longer exist on the physical earth anymore. (digital vs physical land is too simple)

    active participation in these more non-hierarchical digital relations is not just a protest against the tech corps. it is more like the renunciation of a citizenship and joining a new country with better values.

    the comfort and convenience readily available and familiar services are just like out-of-season fruit shipped globally for easy consumption – at all the ecological and human cost, global and local.

    smaller and developing digital relations that’s less convenient – like 小国寡民 (small country small population) ideal of state politics. maybe less enjoyable and more cumbersome in the short turn. but the lack of astronomical power differential is something that no amount of enjoyment and convenience can buy. yet we thought it was. well no, we thought people will have the self-restraint to not go to these astronomical differences. how naive


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *